As a newcomer to astrophotography, the question of which is the right way up for images arises. A moment's thought provides the answer that there's no 'right way up' in space. Indeed an observer in the northern hemisphere - say at latitude 45 degrees North - looking South and imaging an object at declination 0 degrees on the meridian will have the positive declination direction towards the 'top' of the image. Conversely, an observer in the southern hemisphere - say at latitude 45 degrees South - looking North and imaging the same object at declination 0 degrees on the meridian will have the positive declination direction towards the 'bottom' of the image. At first it might be thought that swapping over top and bottom by a 'flip' would make the view the same - but instead a rotation is needed. This involves a 'mirror' in addition to the 'flip'.
Warning: It's best not to use the entirely logical term 'mirror' as it risks descending into a useless discussion about terminology. Instead use 'flip horizontal' and 'flip vertical' - or better still 'flip left-right' and 'flip top-bottom' respectively.
One could avoid the mention of 'flip' completely, as the only relevant transformation is 'rotation' - except for the observation that viewing the same FITS file in different applications reveals that some applications appear to not 'rotate' the image, but perform a single 'flip'. This led to considerable confusion on my part.
The problem is that this error can go unnoticed in an image where there are no clues as to the correct view 'on the sky'. An example of this lack of clues would be star fields. Going up the range where details in the image give an increasing level of 'clues', the easiest objects in which to identify orientation are spiral galaxies. In the representation of a spiral galaxy directly below (actually a Catherine wheel fireworks), the direction of spin is easily seen as anti-clockwise. Rotating this image naturally retains the direction of spin.
Catherine Wheel - Flipped Horizontal - Clockwise Spin |